The following is a transcript of a live presentation
given at Brigham Young University on October 23, 2002 by Dr. LaNae Valentine and Rachel Hickman.
LaNae Valentine:
I want to begin with a disclaimer that it’s
not our intent today to vilify or benign the internet. The internet is a
wonderful invention, and it has really helped facilitate our lives in many
ways, and connect us to people from different parts of the world. It certainly
has facilitated family history work and is a major contributor to the Lord’s
kingdom, and building it, and fulfilling the mission of the Church. But that
will not be our emphasis today. We’re going to be talking about how, as our
title indicates, that cyberspace has really opened up a whole new realm of
relationship abuse. Not that it’s created it, but it’s just another domain
for abuse to play out. I will describe the problem, and then Rachel will
be discussing solutions, and how we can protect ourselves and our families.
I want to begin with some definitions. I
looked in the Oxford English Dictionary for the word “abuse”, and the verb
form is to ill use, or maltreat; to injure wrong, or hurt; to violate, ravish,
or defile. Abuse as a noun is the process of using up or wearing out; wrong
or improper use, misuse, misapplication, perversion. And then the word “violence”
was defined: to do violence, to violate. But I really liked this 1650 translation
which said, “the most sacred things are violence, and the most profane are
licensed.” I think that aptly described our situation somewhat today. Also,
I want to give a definition of cyberspace.
Cyberspace is composed of a variety of media
such as email, list servers, bulletin boards, chat rooms, multi-user domains
(which are referred to as MUD’s), virtual worlds, game spaces, and etc. That
supports social interaction between people who are geographically dislocated.
So again, the whole thing of cyberspace is bringing people together who typically
could not be connected geographically. Many commentators view the fostering
of social interaction as the most significant aspect of cyberspace. Indeed,
there is no denying that these social media are used everyday, and inhabited
by millions of people who are talking, chatting, flirting, discussing, arguing,
and just chatting with one another. In general, analysts argue that the social
media of cyberspace provide one, new conditions under which individuals can
explore and manipulate their identity, and two, new spaces in which communities
with very different characteristics to those in geographic space can be developed
and sustained. So basically, what we have here in the realm of cyberspace
is a bunch of people who might be, they may not by, but they may be manipulating
their identity, so you don’t really know who they are for sure. And then
you’ve got this realm of community that’s just in cyberspace. So, we’re going
to be talking about how these unique features lend themselves to relationship
abuse.
In cyberspace, interaction is conducted through
a medium that strips away body coding, such as age, gender, race, and geographic
place and community. A person’s identity is defined by words and actions,
not body and place. So, this can lead to more facility in behaviors that
could be violent or abusive, and I will cover some of those. The first one
is the sexual solicitation of children. I recently heard a statistic on ABC
World News that one in five American children is solicited for sex on the
internet. And I thought that was a pretty alarming statistic. This is easily
done in cyberspace because your body is irrelevant. You know, your gender,
your age, your sexuality, whether you have a disability or not. All of those
things are disguised. A person can create him or herself however they want
to. A fifty year old man could portray himself as a thirteen year old boy,
or even a thirteen year old girl, for that matter. Young naïve children are
vulnerable targets for predators. Many children are learning to design their
own web pages, and sometimes they put their pictures on their web pages, they
put their addresses, the schools they go to, and lots of identifying information.
This creates a virtual playground for sexual predators who utilize email and
chat rooms to emotionally groom children for a meeting place and a time and
opportunity to act out sexually. Children are not the only population who
are solicited by sexual predators.
Teenage girls and college-aged women are
another vulnerable population. Sexual predators are slick talkers who use
flattery and manipulation to develop a false sense of trust with their victims.
They are very skilled at conning and grooming a victim into sexual activity.
I don’t know if you heard about Orem city police recently investigating a
case where a twenty year old Orem woman met a fellow in a chat room on the
internet, and was chatting, and after awhile, gave him her address, and he
came over, and she invited him in, and he raped her. So, I think we need
to teach our children to be very careful about who we’re meeting, and not
to give out identifying information.
Another interesting phenomena and way in
which sexual assault can occur is what is called virtual rape. Virtual rape
can occur within a multi-user domain if one player finds a way to control
the actions of another player’s character, and can thus force the character
to have sex. So in a multi-user domain, you have a bunch of characters who
have gotten together, and they’re creating this little society. A character
could be a doctor, a lawyer, a businessman, whatever, and somehow, your character
could get control of another character, and force that character to have sex,
and be raped. And that’s a virtual form of sexual assault. And again, people
can justify it, that it’s just a game, it’s just fantasy, but you have to
wonder what kinds of ramifications that has on them. Things we need to remember
is that there are perpetrators out there. We don’t know who we’re meeting
on the internet. You know only what they are willing to share, and you have
no way of verifying if what you are sharing is true, and predators often tend
to prey on women and children. Another feature is online addictions. Many
addictive- compulsive behavior is acted out on the internet such as sexual
addictions, compulsive gambling, e-mailing addictions. I actually read in
Time magazine that there’s a twelve step program for email addicts. You know,
gaming and e-trading. People take up residence on the internet, it becomes
their place of residence, and it becomes a very compulsive environment. Often,
the internet is used as a place to escape problems when people are depressed
or anxious, or feel guilty and bad, and it’s just very easy to get on the
internet and escape into this other world. One must resort, however, to deceiving
family members, sometimes, and colleagues and friends, and sometimes, whole
careers and educations are jeopardized because of addictions that happen on
the internet. Sometimes, there are significant financial consequences for
online addictions. In all instances, one’s ability to relate declines. He
or she withdraws from the family. No spouse can compare with the excitement
and intrigue of the internet. Relational expansion results in being closer
to an electron friend, with high sexual intensity, than to real people with
human weaknesses and inconvenient demands.
Here’s a letter to the editor of Time magazine
in June of this year-a woman who wrote in after reading an article on dangerous
gaming. She said, “I do not believe that internet fantasy games like Everquest
can ever be harmless family fun. My husband invests so much of his time in
his fantasy character that if he were his real life character, he would have
five graduate degrees by now. He gets so involved in games like Everquest
that he ignores his responsibilities. At least when someone is watching too
much TV, you can just unplug the set. That is not so easy with online computer
games. I consider myself a computer widow. My husband tells me these games
are fun, but he does a lot of cursing at the computer screen. It doesn’t
look like fun to me. It looks like a violent, addictive game. Evercrack
is a better name for it.”
Another phenomena that happens on the internet
is cyber-stalking, or online harassment, and other cyber crimes, such as voyeurism,
exhibitionism, stalking, privacy threats, financial scams, identity theft,
and other illegal online acts. And so, I’m not going to go into all of those,
but just any way a person can be violent and abusive, they can do that on
the internet, and a lot of people are really concerned about the identity
theft. They’ve purchased something over the internet, and someone has found
their name, or their credit card number, and taken it on as their own. So
again, we just need to be careful how we put ourselves out there. Violent
video games are another phenomena that they are marketed to children and teenagers,
and often simulate shootings, rapes, violence-all forms of violence. Certainly
the producers of these games deny that they might have any adverse effects,
yet there is evidence that continuous, or even infrequent viewing or participating
in violent video games does affect behavior. I don’t know if you remember
the case in Kentucky where the young man went to school and shot several children
on the school grounds. And the police were really quite amazed that he was
so precise in his targets-that every single child he shot he had shot in the
forehead between the eyes, and this child had never fired a gun before in
his life. He admitted to the police that he had gotten his target practice
through simulated computer games that simulated shootings and targeting people
in the forehead between the eyes. So, it just doesn’t seem like playing violent
video games is conducive to developing loving, patient, respectful types of
relationships.
Sex education on the web is another phenomena.
Many young people are getting their sex education on the internet, and it’s
an alarming fact that pornography is being used as a reference point for normal,
natural, and commonly practiced sexual activity. Many young men admit that
everything they’ve learned about how to treat women, they’ve learned from
pornography. One young man responded regarding his pornography use is that
“it just teaches you a lot of weird stuff you want to try on your girl.”
Studies reveal that people who view pornography report more aggressive attitudes
toward women. One respondent admitted that porn desensitized him to women,
that it made him want to degrade them, and to slap them around. Others use
such words as manhandle. Some even acknowledge that continually watching
these images caused them to lose track of a real relationship with a real
woman. Porn delivers an image of masculinity that is removed from emotion
and any moral decision. There is a lot of violence in pornography that often
goes unnoticed, because it’s sexualized. So any time you sexualize violence
towards a woman or child, sometimes people don’t even notice it or see it.
Children are being profoundly affected by
what they see. Sometimes children will accidentally stumble upon a pornographic
site, and sometimes, they will be curious and be looking, but in either case,
they see things, and they think “I want to try that”, and sometimes, they’re
actually very traumatized by what they see. Some will become sexually aversive,
others might become sexually aroused and compulsive. Another phenomena is
the forced viewing of pornography, where someone not only views pornography
him or herself, but uses it, enforces it upon another person, and uses it
to convince someone to have sex, or to have sex in a way that they don’t want.
They use the steps or the instructions outlined in the pornography. Specific
pieces of pornography are acted out on someone in a dating, acquaintance,
incestuous, stranger, or partner situation. Sometimes including verbal references
to the pornography and behavior found in the pornography. Certainly, this
is a form of sexual abuse when those sorts of behaviors are being forced upon
a person against their will. Pornography is used in childhood sexual abuse
to show a child what is desired and how to perform sexual activity, and to
convince them that the activity will be enjoyable-again, another serious form
of sexual abuse.
Another one is cyber sex and internet affairs.
Sex is the most frequently searched topic on the internet according to Freeman,
Longer, and Blanchard in a 1998 study. Estimates suggest that 20% of users
engage in online sexual activity, approaching 75 million people worldwide.
A study by MSNBC.com found over 9 million users visited adult entertainment
websites, and 23% of women, and 50% of men surfed the web for visual erotica.
Another MSNBC.com survey of 7,000 people indicated 60% did not consider cyber
sex with another person to be infidelity. And then another interesting statistic-they
found that most downloads occur between 9am and 5pm, which indicates that
a lot of activity on the internet is going on during work time. So, they
can’t be very productive at work if they’re doing that. Cyber sex involves
using computerized text, images, or sound files for sexual stimulation. Cyber
infidelity occurs when a partner in a committed relationship uses the computer
to violate agreements of sexual exclusivity. So usually, an internet affair
will start innocently. Two people meet in a chat room, and they begin chatting.
Then it tends to progress into flirting, and it goes into these progressive
steps. It usually begins with non-sexually explicit flirting, sexual innuendo,
and then it becomes more explicit. Then they get together in a chat room
and schedule a sex-laced chat. They begin discussing sexual preferences and
fantasies, and then actually evolve into planning face to face meetings and
physical contact, and that’s usually what happens. It’s easy for them to
rationalize that it’s not as serious as a real affair, especially if they
haven’t gotten to that point of physically meeting and acting out. But it
is a betrayal when you begin flirting with someone and revealing emotions
and things to that person that should be exclusive to your spouse.
Internet affairs are the epitome of self-presentation.
That means presenting yourself in the way you want to be seen, and the antithesis
of intimacy, which is self-confrontation and self-disclosure in the presence
of a partner. So, there’s this illusion of intimate contact with this person
on the internet, but it really is the absolute antithesis of that, because
true intimacy involves revealing who you really are to another real person,
and that does not happen on the internet. The privacy and anonymity of the
internet leads to emotional and sexual engagement beyond what people often
do in face to face encounters, even with their own spouses. Many clinicians
are finding that women are just as likely to engage in cyber affairs as men,
including many who in their daily lives would never dream of an emotional
or sexual extramarital liaison. Internet affairs are facilitated by ease
of convenience, self-deception, about where stepping over the line occurs,
rampant opportunities for self presentation and getting validation from others.
So it’s easy to have an internet affair, because the line is fuzzy, at least
in a lot of people’s minds. I’m not really doing anything wrong, this is
just a game, it’s just a fantasy. So even though, perhaps, the rise of internet
affairs reflects how the technology creates this new ambiguity regarding violations
of monogamy, it also reflects the difficulties people commonly have in defining
the self and not violating it. So, one of the real problems here is in people
defining “this is who I am, this is what my values are, this is what I’m committed
to, this is what I stand for.” The people are having difficulty defining
that, and not violating it. Another interesting thing that I read that explains
why are so many people having internet affairs, and why are so many people
caught up in pornography on the internet. According to David Shnarka, a family
therapist, he says, “growing up in an emotionally volatile, or a sexually
physically abusive household, accentuates the normal anxiety arousal and sexual
arousal pattern into a dominant sexual response.” Given that a third of women
are sexually abused growing up, he believes this explains the large number
of women, in particular, who have internet affairs. So it goes back to this
whole cycle of abuse that is perpetuated in society, or it can go back to
that. That people who have been sexually and emotionally abused are more
at risk, perhaps, of an internet affair. So, how do we explain and how do
we justify all this activity in cyberspace. This unloving activity that does
go into the realm of abusive and violent behavior.
Is it really possible to respect and love
women and view pornography at the same time? Pornographers use every attribute
any woman has and sexualizes and dehumanizes it. This process of dehumanization
is the means of changing people into things. Women’s lives are made two dimensional
and dead. It’s hard to remember that she’s a real human being. Dehumanizing
someone alone is cruel, and is the first step towards violence. There is
a desire to hurt, to intimidate, to humiliate. There is an underlying dimension
of pushing someone down, subordinating them, making them less. And even though
women and children are the obvious victims of pornography, men, too, are exploited
and dehumanized by pornography use. Men are mis-educated and misled to believe
that it’s normal to be aggressive, and treat women as they are portrayed in
pornography. Also, by some of the degrading acts in porn, males are taught
that women are less than men, and that they actually approve of the violence
against themselves. Men learn an unrealistic standard of beauty, womanhood,
and femininity. They learn that in relationships, women are supposed to comply
and submit. Women learn that they are a standard of oppression, and they
learn what they have to do in order to be accepted. I want to read a quote
from a young man who had a pornography problem and was able to get out of
it, and this was some of the reasoning he expressed: “It was in my personal
attitudes toward women that I began to question more deeply my involvement
with pornography. Probably my biggest source of cognitive dissonance was
my comparing the women I saw on the computer screen with the women in my life.
Particularly the women of my family, who were by far the dominant role models
of my childhood. The family women were independent, intelligent, warm, humorous,
well founded human beings. The women portrayed on screen were essentially
objects for male pleasure. Personality wise, they were either obsequies and
servile, or cold, conniving, opportunists. These two contrasting images of
women from my family and the video screen never quite lined up in my mind.”
He continues, “one of the most common questions asked is, does repeated exposure
to pornographic images of women lead men to misogynistic attitudes? I would
have to answer yes. It is my belief that a man could not disrespect, abuse,
or rape a woman unless there was a preconceived notion in his mind that women
were less than. When media in general, and pornography in particular, emphasize
a woman’s body parts, impose notions of her sexuality, or her physical appearance
above all her other qualities when there is a de-emphasis on her intellect,
her creativity, her humanness, the stage is being set for perceiving her as
an inferior, as less than. This warped perception may very well open the
door to psychological, verbal, and physical abuse.”
I want to review the definition of the word
pornography. I think that when we get to the very roots of words, it teaches
us a lot about that particular phenomena. And I hadn’t known this that pornography,
the word, comes from the ancient Greek porna and graphos, which translates
into “writing about whores.” Porna means whore, specifically and exclusively
the lowest class of whore, which in ancient Greece was the brothel slut.
The porna was the cheapest, in the literal sense. Least regarded, least respected
of all women, including slaves. She was simply and clearly an absolutely
sexual slave. Graphos means writing, etching, or drawing. So, the
word pornography does not simply mean writing about sex, or depictions of
the erotic, or any other such euphemism. It means the graphic depiction of
women as vile whores. In pornography, the real pleasure of sex is the debasing
of women. I thought that was really quite graphic in that that’s what that
word means. It means writing about whores, debasing a woman into that term.
So, when a person is viewing pornography, that’s basically what that person
is doing, debasing a woman. And vice versa, if a woman is viewing a man in
that way. Very far removed from loving behavior that connects us and makes
us sensitive to one another. There was a time when our bodies, and I’m speaking
mainly of women’s bodies, were not treated like objects, but were honored
for their spiritual properties. The miraculous ability to give birth and
nurture new life. But over time, this connection has been lost and repressed
through the rise of the consumer culture. Women’s bodies weren’t created
for the purpose of selling beer, new cars, and other products. Nor were they
intended to be a commodity to control or manipulate in order to get what we
need, or to define our self worth. All of us, men and women alike, are gods
and goddesses in embryo, to be honored and respected as sacred. Our bodies
are sacred-sacred means holy, consecrated, and to be revered. It also means
to be secure against violence and abuse. So Rachel will continue now with
some solutions to these problems that we find in the realm of cyber space.
Rachel Hickman:
So, as Lenae has begun to talk about, what
is the result of these different uses of the Internet? And that result is
disconnection. I’m going to read two different quotes, and it’s going to
set up, almost in a sense, two ends of the spectrum, or maybe two things that
are pulling at us at the same time. And the first one is from Rex E. Pinnegar.
He said, “We learn truths by way of the spirit. But by way of the body, we
learn to be like Heavenly Father. The body constantly reinforces truth, is
constant testimony of truth. Truly, when kept pure the body is filled with
the light of Christ. The body is a source of fullness for the spirit, because
through the body, the spirit learns how to feel.” On the other end, there’s
something else that’s pulling at us, perhaps what we’ve set ourselves up with
in this particular society that we’re born into. This is a quote from Hayes,
Stosil, and Wilson, they’re therapists, and they kind of made this distinction
about what language does for us, and what we’ve created for ourselves. It
says, “Language allows events to be abstracted and treated as objects. We
are taught the nature and meaning of specific emotions, for example. A loose
collection of bodily states, thoughts, behavioral predispositions and contextual
factors are gathered together under a verbal label, and we learn to call them
depression or anxiety. Our emotions become thing like, and verbally accessible.
They are then evaluated, which gives them both conventional and valence functions.
Virtually all of our measures of psychopathology are built on the assumption
that to be psychologically healthy is to be free of disordered emotions and
cognitive responses. According to this standard, a coma victim might be considered
the ideal of psychological health. Popular culture is relentless in its promotion
of this view of health. In a recent beer commercial, a bar filled with young
vibrant women and men having apparently an ideal Friday evening, the characters
in the bar looked quite normal except that instead of heads, they have big
yellow happy face buttons. “Don’t worry, be happy,” the song says. The problem
is that the ideal is a purely verbal concept. It is both unattainable and
out of contact with how humans actually can move forward with pain. Not only
does one not live such a life, the effort to produce it is destructive. Yet
this motive is one of the central themes of our modern culture. It’s interesting,
and I think we’re going to have to agree with Maya Angelou when she said,
“the language you speak is made of the words that are killing you.” I wonder
if with the language we’ve created and the verbal context that we’ve set for
ourselves that we’ve set ourselves up to really struggle, and to suffer in
ways that are maybe unnecessary. It’s true that pain is very characteristic
of the human condition, and it’s not a bad thing, and yet we’re set up to
think that it is, and we cause ourselves to suffer further. So, we’re encouraged
to disconnect, in a sense, from ourselves, because we’re taught that pain
is wrong, and then at the same time, going back to Elder Pinegar, he talks
about us being created to feel, and also being in that we can feel, we’re
also created to connect with others. So now, just returning to this idea
of the Internet, we have two different items that we’re talking about then.
We have, perhaps, these virtual worlds that Lenae talked about where we’re
looking for some kind of connection, and yet we are isolated in doing so.
And then this other form where it’s facilitating this disconnection that is
already manifest in our society where we objectify and remove ourselves from
people, and can treat them like objects, and then in turn, generalize that
idea, and take that into relationships with people around us. And so, in
those two respects, the Internet can help us to disconnect from ourselves,
and the Internet intimacy trap that we previously mentioned, I believe that
that is basically the idea that our needs for intimacy, whether they be emotional,
intellectual, sexual, what have you, can be met solely through electronic
means, and I believe that that idea is incorrect, and really leads us down
a destructive road. We’ve talked about the Internet intimacy trap, and now
we’re going to talk about steps to move forward, move beyond this trap that
we’ve kind of outlined.
The first thing that we’re going to talk
about as a solution to this, is connecting to self, and connecting to God.
What I want to do is I want to tell a little bit of a story, so sit back and
relax for a minute. This is a little parable written by a man named Spencer
Johnson. He tells a story of a little boy, very happy, and a very content,
very satisfied old man who watches him play, and work, and very much enjoys
watching this little boy enjoy his life. The little boy often would come
to talk to the old man, and the old man, in their conversations, introduced
him to what is called the “precious present”, and the little boy was really
excited. He knew about presents, he’d experienced Christmas and his birthday
before, and as this old man talked about this precious present, he was excited
and hoped that perhaps, one day, someone would give him this precious gift.
As time went on, and he grew older, he became more and more distressed, because
he never did get this precious present, and he would often come back to talk
to this old man, and became very frustrated and said, “Why don’t you just
give it to me?” And the old man would continually tell him, “It’s something
that I cannot give to you. It’s something that you give yourself.” And so
what this man did was set off on a journey, in a sense, where he went all
across the world, looking in the tops of mountains, and under the ocean, he
looked on Wall Street, he looked in the mirror, he looked in the newspaper,
and wherever he went, and wherever he looked, he could not find this present
that his good friend had told him about. He became very, very unhappy and
very ill. Finally, during this process, he continually was returning to his
old friend, and that’s where we’re going to pick up the story. He says, “After
many years, the once young man returned to inquire further. He was now very
unhappy, and often ill. He needed to talk to the old man, but the old man
had grown very, very old, and all too soon, he spoke no more. The wise voice
could no longer be heard. The man was alone. At first he was saddened by
the loss of his old friend, and then he became frightened-very frightened.
And he was afraid that he would never learn how to be happy until he finally
accepted what had always been true. He was the only one who could find his
own happiness. The unhappy man recalled that the happy old man had told him
so many years ago that as hard as he tried, he could not figure it out. He
tried to understand what he had heard. The precious present has nothing to
do with wishing. When you have the precious present, you’ll be perfectly
content to be where you are. The richness of the precious present comes from
it’s own source. The precious present is not something that someone gives
to you. It is a gift you give yourself. The unhappy man was now tired looking
for the precious present. He had grown so tired of trying that he simply
stopped trying, and then it happened. He didn’t know why it happened, when
it happened-it just happened. He realized that the precious present was just
that-the present. Not the past, and not the future, but the precious
present. He realized that the present moment is always precious. Not because
it is absolutely flawless, which it often seems not to be, but because it
is absolutely everything it is meant to be at that moment. In an instant,
the man was happy. He realized that he was in the precious present, and he
goes through the process of all of a sudden realizing. He starts to lose
that and says, well, look at all the time I wasted. Look at how many places
I went, and what I did, and so many precious moments that I missed. And then
he caught himself, and he realized, ah, I’ve lost the gift again. And then
he was happy for a moment, until then he thought, “Will I be able to find
this again in the future?” And then he began to realize he was living in
the future. And then we move on. He listened to what he now knew, and he
listened to the wisdom of his own voice. “It is wise for me to think about
the past and to learn from my past, but it is not wise for me to be in the
past, for that is how I lose myself. It is also wise for me to think about
the future, to prepare for my future, but it is not wise for me to be in the
future, for that too is how I lose myself. And when I lose myself, I lose
what is most precious to me.” It was so simple, and now he saw it. The present
nourished him. But the man knew it was not going to be easy. Learning to
be in the present was a process that he was going to have to do over and over
again and again. Now he realized why he’d enjoyed being with the old man.
The old man was totally present. When he was with the younger man, the older
man was not thinking about something else, or wishing he was somewhere else.
He was fully present, and it felt good to be with such a person. The younger
man smiled at himself the way the old man used to smile. He knew, “I can
choose to be happy now, or I can choose to be happy when or if.” The man
chose now. And now, the man was happy. He felt at peace with himself. He
agreed to savor each moment in his life as perfect, the apparently good, and
the apparently bad, even if he did not understand why. For the first time
in his life, it didn’t matter. He accepted each of his precious moments on
this planet as a gift. There’s something special about that metaphor. There’s
something wonderful about the art of being present. I think in those moments
when we are present, we can learn to connect with what we really are.
There’s a couple of questions that an author,
her name is Aria Mountain Dreamer, presented, in the beginning of her book,
and I wanted to read a couple of them to you for you to consider. She said,
“what if it truly doesn’t matter what you do, but how you do whatever you
do? How would this change what you choose to do with your life? What if
you could be more present and open hearted with every person you meet-if you
were working as a cashier on a corner store, or as a parking lot attendant?
Then you could, if you were doing a job you think is more important. How
would this change how you want spend your precious time on this earth? What
if your contribution to the world and the fulfillment of your own happiness
is not dependent upon discovering a better method of prayer, or technique
of meditation, not dependent upon reading the right book, or attending the
right seminar, but upon really seeing and deeply appreciating yourself, and
the world as they are right now. What if there was no need to change, no
need to try to transform yourself into someone who is more compassionate,
more present, more loving, more wise? How would this affect all the places
in your life where you are endlessly trying to be better? What if the task
is simply to unfold, to become who you already are in your essential nature?
Gentle, compassionate, capable of living fully and passionately present.
How would this affect how you feel when you wake up in the morning? What
if the question is not, why am I so infrequently the person I really want
to be, but why do I so infrequently want to be the person I really am? What
if becoming who and what we truly are happens not through striving and trying,
but by recognizing and receiving the people and places and practices that
offer us the warmth and encouragement that we need to unfold? Those are poignant
questions.
And I believe this leads into our next idea,
which is that once we’ve reconnected with ourselves, when we can be present,
then we can be still. And as stillness permeates our life, the Lord is able
to enter in. When the Lord enters in, he offers us something special. He
offers us the enabling power of grace. In the Bible dictionary, it’s described
in this way: “It is through the grace of the Lord, Jesus, made possible by
His atoning sacrifice that mankind may be raised in immortality, every person
receiving his body from the grave in a condition of everlasting life. It
is likewise through the grace of the Lord that individuals, through faith
in the atonement of Jesus Christ, and repentance of their sins, receives strength
and assistance to do good works that they otherwise would not be able to maintain,
if left to their own means. This grace is an enabling power that allows men
and women to lay hold on eternal life and exaltation after they have expended
their own best efforts.” Truly, I think the Lord meant what He said when
He said, “Come unto me all ye that labor and are heavy laden, and I will give
you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me, for I am meek and lowly
of heart, and ye shall find rest unto your souls, for my yoke is easy, and
my burden is light.” Perhaps spirituality, or a connection with God, is not
about Him removing our difficulties, our burdens and sorrows, wiping them
away as if they are not there anymore, and as if they never happened. Perhaps
it is about being filled with a power that strengthens us, that allows us
to go from just being on this continuum of happy and sad, and being able to
drift into a third place, where we can appreciate wherever we are, whatever
context we’re in, and be filled with gratitude from the Lord. So again, when
we accept what is, we give ourselves the possibility of accepting who we are,
as we are right now. Self-acceptance allows inner-stillness. When stillness
permeates our being, God can enter in freely; when God enters in, we can create
community.
And what is community? I’m going to return
to the Oxford English Dictionary, like LaNae, and read you some definitions.
From the Latin roots of this word, we find these meanings: fellowship, community,
of relations or feelings. I like that. A community of relations or feelings.
Also, a body of fellows, or fellow townsmen. I don’t believe that community
is merely a case of prohinquity, or geographic closeness to someone. I believe
it’s also a quality or state of being, and you cannot separate those two.
You cannot separate the fact that we need to be together, flesh and blood,
body and soul, with also a quality and state of being. When we allow ourselves,
and give ourselves opportunity to be with others, and to create community,
we allow synergy to happen. Synergy is kind of a chemistry term where, in
a sense, you have one element, plus another element doesn’t equal just the
sum of those two, but rather maybe double, triple, or quadruple the power
of those two on their own. But maybe even more so, creating community is
something that we can give to someone else. I believe in my heart that creating
community is about sharing, stillness, and acceptance with others.
I want to read you one last final quote.
This is from a man named David Kearsey, from his book called “Please Understand
Me”, and it’s entitled, “Different Drummers.” He says, “If I do not want
what you want, please try not to tell me that what I want is wrong. Or if
I believe other than you, at least pause before you correct my view. Or if
my emotion is less than yours, or more, given the same circumstance, try not
to ask me to feel more strongly or weakly. Or yet, if I act or fail to act
in the manner of your design for action, let me be. I do not, for the moment
at least, ask you to understand me. That will only come when you are willing
to give up changing me into a copy of you. I may be your spouse, your parent,
your offspring, your friend or colleague. If you allow me any of my own wants,
or emotions, or beliefs, or actions, then you open yourself up so that one
day, these ways of mine might not seem so wrong, and might finally appear
to you as a right, for me. To put up with me is the first step to understanding
me. Not that you embrace my ways as right for you, but that you are no longer
irritated or disappointed with me for my seeming waywardness. And in understanding
me, you might come to prize my differences from you. And far from seeking
to change me, preserve and even nurture those differences.” I think that’s
the essence of community. I think when we can create a sense of community
within our relationships with others, within our homes, and within our communities
in general, within the towns or cities that we live, we are less likely to
fall prey to the intimacy trap that the internet can offer to us. We’re less
likely to objectify and to abuse others. Rather than that, rather than trying
to force and control, we will accept and nurture. May we offer this gift
to someone else, may we offer this gift to ourselves, and may we foster connections-true
connections-in our lives, and be able to recognize counterfeits when they
are presented to us.